So I thought at one point that this month was the death knell for my production of art. Nothing I was producing pleased me in the slightest; I thought it was all dreadful (mostly because it was all dreadful). Then I did that Iron-Man speedpaint from the last post and things started to turn around again.
Todays piece was started in January, but finished in February (in fact the final piece was painted entirely in February) and like everything else from the first chunk of this month I'm really not happy with it, but I concede that it's way better than it had any right to be, as you may see upon reading the tale behind it. Before that though, let's take a look at the final work...
Yep, it's a caricatured beauty queen. Actually I'm not sure she's wearing the sash due to her beauty (though she's not unattractive), but she is a queen in a similar sense - oh, it really doesn't matter, let's start at the beginning. From this point on the names have been changed to protect the innocent.*
So I used to work with a woman who we'll call A, who left the company about a year ago. We still stay in touch and I guess we're good friends as far as two folks who live a way apart can be. She contacted me in January and asked if I remember doing a given portrait that she'd been impressed with; the significance of which portrait she mentioned was lost on me at the time because I was busy - you'll find out which it was in a bit. So I said yes, and she asked if I could do a portrait for her.
Now if I was going to charge for such a thing I would have mentioned this right off the bat, but since I'm pretty sure I owe A a favor I didn't bring it up at all; this would be a freebie and she could owe me a favor again in return. So I say "Sure, who do you want me to paint?" and she sends me a photo.
It's the worst possible photo to work from. OK, that's a lie, it could have been worse - it could have been of the back of someones head; but this was only slightly better. I'm not going to show you the source images as the subject (who we'll now call Z) hasn't given permission for me to use them, but trust me; it was ghastly. It looked like a photograph of another photograph that was itself not taken under the best of conditions, and it was really small.
You could tell the subject was pretty, but that was about all it had going for it - her eyes were tiny, the perspective was weird, the image was noisy and very blurred and the whole picture was 320 pixels high. This was not a good picture to paint from. A speedpaint I could probably do, but a nice portrait? Ugh. She got me another picture later which was much clearer but a similar size and full body - so her face was even smaller. This wasn't actually for A, but for her brother, so I assume she was relying on him for the images, but anyway, it was not ideal.
This is a sketch I managed to cobble together from the two photographs. I sent it to A and she pointed out some discrepancies and I looked at the photos and the sketch and realized this wasn't going to work at all. Then I looked at the photos again, and realised I could go all Sherlock on it. The second photo had text visible on the sash, and with some squinting I could sort of make out sort of what it said. Google time!
I found about a dozen images of Z, and they were all deficient in some way. All of them were better than the original photo, but all of them were also very small. Z doesn't share her facebook photos publicly, and I didn't want to try friending her in case the portrait was supposed to be a surprise for her, and without that reason why would she friend me? "Hi, you don't know me, but I'm the nearly forty year old friend of A and... Oh, I hear sirens!" (I actually have no idea how old she is, but I'm guessing between 17 and 19)
Basically I felt like a creepy stalker that night, but while I didn't get any pictures that were much use on their own, together I thought I might be able to cobble something out of them. So another sketch ensued.
A cleared it and I started painting. This did not go well, though I liked the background. I think there's 3 or 4 hours work in the one below, which I've included fairly large, but I was not happy with the progress at all. It felt stiled and oddly fake, like a painting of a mannequin or something. Then I got sick (turns out I was sicker than I thought, I just went to bed early, but after a visit to the doctor after a couple of days it turned out I was lucky not to be in a hospital. Great!), and sent A my progress.
"Oh," she says, "I was expecting more of a caricature."
Damn and blast! Y'see, when she initially asked me if I remembered a particular portrait it was my one of the 9th Doctor, and then I'd simply spaced on the significance of that being a caricature.
Oh Well then, back, as the title says, to the drawing board. Rather than start completely from scratch I took the original sketch and drew over it and warped it a little in Photoshop. You may think the cheeks I've drawn are a little OTT, but they're there with the certain knowledge I'm going to paint over them; they're purely guidelines for form rather than light.
Then I started painting over the background I already had.
Around here I sent it to A. "Wow James thats looking awesome!!!!!" was the response. I think four exclamation marks may have been overkill, but I did appreciate the sentiment.
After that I just needed to finish it up. Painting the crown was the hardest part, and I hate the result - If I'd had a lot of time I would have done it again, but I was supposed to get the finished piece to her by February 10th, and as it was she didn't get it until the day after (that whole sick thing slowed me down a lot). You'll note I changed the background? Well, with the new direction I didn't feel the icy scene was going to work, and changing it allowed me to go in there with some stage lighting style edge lights.
And after this step I took it into Photoshop for a smidgen of cleanup and some glares on her jewelry and such (this is something I usually don't do) and the result is of course at the top of the page.
I don't know if A still thinks it's awesome as she thanked me but took it no further. I also don't know what the actual client thought because he hadn't responded to A last time I spoke to her. I also don't know what Z thought of the whole thing - to the best of my knowledge she's yet to see it. For me though, I'm not happy with aspects of the picture, but given the tiny, grainy, blurred and distorted image I was initially given to work from I think I did okay. I actually have no idea if it really looks anything like the subject though, I hope it does, and that she likes it enough to forgive my evening of being a creepy stalker.
*They've actually been changed because based on Z's level of privacy online I'm guessing she doesn't want her name thrown around much, and I'm fine with respecting that. Besides, now she sounds like one of the Men In Black... Hey Z, you ever want a picture of yourself as an MIB, you go ahead and send me a good quality photo mmm'kay?
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Right Up To Ludicrous Speed
Keeping fairly true to promise for a change, here we are again with another round of speed paints. Less of them, but more often. Despite the post's title I've found that my speed painting is slowing down. They quite regularly take more than an hour now, which is just not cool (the occasional hour+ piece is fine, but this was more often than not). I'm making a concentrated effort to do them faster again now I've noticed this trend, but this can mean that some of them are only partially complete or look very rough. Such is the nature of speedpaints.
So, let's take look at what I've done in the past month or so...
Time Taken - 90 Minutes
This was taken from stock by "spiked-Stock" on DeviantArt. I liked the pose a lot (I stumbled across it while looking for reference I ended up not using for the sketches in the last post), but flipped it and painted it a little more blue. I've done a terrible job capturing her likeness, but that wasn't really the pint of the piece. One of the reason's this one took so long was because I was using the art marker tool instead of oils. I like how they look, but I find them hard to work with (they tend to blend in unexpected ways). Don't be surprised if you see more from this stock source at some point.
Time Taken - 85 Minutes
This one is not worth time time it took in my opinion. You can clearly see who it's supposed to be I suppose, but it looks more like a nasty vector piece than a nice dynamic speedpaint. This is one I'm 80% sure I'll some back to at some point, there's potential here, but this isn't showing it.
Incidentally, this was one of those rare speedpaints where I took a little time to do some lineart before I started with the paint (this contributed to the extended time on this one as the sketch took 25 minutes. I think I like the sketch better than the extended work, so here it is for you to see.
You see, I think this is far more interesting stylistically than the end result... I wonder if I can transfer some of that style into paint, and not worry so much about getting it looking realistic... If you're not recognizing the subject it's Rutger Hauer as Roy Batty in the Film Blade Runner
Time Taken - 50 Minutes
This was a bit more speedy, and with the exception of one small thing I think it came out really well. It's a self portrait done for my various profile pictures. I like that it's sort of conflicting as to what's going on - is it suicide or murder? Is there nothing in there to block the water or are those brains on the right? It's all just a bit of fun, but it does look quite a bit like me. The thing I'm not happy with (if you're interested) is the hand and arm holding the gun. I probably could have fixed it if I'd been willing to spend longer on it, but as a speedpaint it had run it's course.
Time Taken - 35 Minutes
Yes, this is as big as I painted it. I was going to paint a series of faces, each with a different base hue, but my son needed me after the first one and I never got back to it. I'm not happy with the placement of her eyes (they're too lose together), but other than that it's OK. It's based on a picture I found through Google image search. It's got some cool search features these days, so you can tell it to just show faces and restrict the colour palette to a given colour, which is what I did. I've had the picture for a while though, so I no longer remember where I actually got it or who she is. Terrible I know.
And in a serendipitous bit of timing my son needs me...
Time Taken - 5 Minutes
I've never really said before, but my speedpaints really don't take exactly the time I say they do - I tend to round them up to the nearest 5 minutes to save having to be very precise about timing them. So this one may have taken more like 4 minutes and 3 seconds or something, I'm not exactly sure... However long it took it's not terribly good, but I do think there's some good stuff happening here given the time taken and that I had no reference; it could have gone interesting places if I'd pushed on with it. I honestly don't remember why I didn't
Time Taken - 65 Minutes
My son wanted to paint Iron-Man with me. This is not that piece (that's below) but after we were done I wondered how much better a job I could do without him sliding on and off my knee, his head bobbing in the way of my vision and his hand constantly nudging mine (this during the bits he wanted me to paint of course, his bits he stayed pretty still for. So, it's OK, but Iron-Man is way to complex a shape for ah hour I think (I cropped off the rest of the arms because they were just shapeless red blobs). I'm still not happy, but it did come out better than the version with my boy...
And to be fair to him all the stuff is the right colour and in the right place, he just hasn't got the shapes down yet (the yellow stuff to the left is mine). The original photo has an orangy/yellow robot visible behind Iron-Man's head for example. I think he did rather well all things considered.
Time Taken - 35 Minutes
I wanted to drag the time of my paints back down kicking and screaming, and this was the result. It's based on yet more stock, this time from Marcus Ranum, who also does some top quality photography. Aspects of this are a bit rough (partly due to the speed I was going, something I'm out of practice with again) but overall I think I got the essence of the original photograph, and his neck area turned out pretty well IMO.
By the way, the title of the post is a quote from Spaceballs, if you were curious.
So, let's take look at what I've done in the past month or so...
Time Taken - 90 Minutes
This was taken from stock by "spiked-Stock" on DeviantArt. I liked the pose a lot (I stumbled across it while looking for reference I ended up not using for the sketches in the last post), but flipped it and painted it a little more blue. I've done a terrible job capturing her likeness, but that wasn't really the pint of the piece. One of the reason's this one took so long was because I was using the art marker tool instead of oils. I like how they look, but I find them hard to work with (they tend to blend in unexpected ways). Don't be surprised if you see more from this stock source at some point.
Time Taken - 85 Minutes
This one is not worth time time it took in my opinion. You can clearly see who it's supposed to be I suppose, but it looks more like a nasty vector piece than a nice dynamic speedpaint. This is one I'm 80% sure I'll some back to at some point, there's potential here, but this isn't showing it.
Incidentally, this was one of those rare speedpaints where I took a little time to do some lineart before I started with the paint (this contributed to the extended time on this one as the sketch took 25 minutes. I think I like the sketch better than the extended work, so here it is for you to see.
You see, I think this is far more interesting stylistically than the end result... I wonder if I can transfer some of that style into paint, and not worry so much about getting it looking realistic... If you're not recognizing the subject it's Rutger Hauer as Roy Batty in the Film Blade Runner
Time Taken - 50 Minutes
This was a bit more speedy, and with the exception of one small thing I think it came out really well. It's a self portrait done for my various profile pictures. I like that it's sort of conflicting as to what's going on - is it suicide or murder? Is there nothing in there to block the water or are those brains on the right? It's all just a bit of fun, but it does look quite a bit like me. The thing I'm not happy with (if you're interested) is the hand and arm holding the gun. I probably could have fixed it if I'd been willing to spend longer on it, but as a speedpaint it had run it's course.
Time Taken - 35 Minutes
Yes, this is as big as I painted it. I was going to paint a series of faces, each with a different base hue, but my son needed me after the first one and I never got back to it. I'm not happy with the placement of her eyes (they're too lose together), but other than that it's OK. It's based on a picture I found through Google image search. It's got some cool search features these days, so you can tell it to just show faces and restrict the colour palette to a given colour, which is what I did. I've had the picture for a while though, so I no longer remember where I actually got it or who she is. Terrible I know.
And in a serendipitous bit of timing my son needs me...
Time Taken - 5 Minutes
I've never really said before, but my speedpaints really don't take exactly the time I say they do - I tend to round them up to the nearest 5 minutes to save having to be very precise about timing them. So this one may have taken more like 4 minutes and 3 seconds or something, I'm not exactly sure... However long it took it's not terribly good, but I do think there's some good stuff happening here given the time taken and that I had no reference; it could have gone interesting places if I'd pushed on with it. I honestly don't remember why I didn't
Time Taken - 65 Minutes
My son wanted to paint Iron-Man with me. This is not that piece (that's below) but after we were done I wondered how much better a job I could do without him sliding on and off my knee, his head bobbing in the way of my vision and his hand constantly nudging mine (this during the bits he wanted me to paint of course, his bits he stayed pretty still for. So, it's OK, but Iron-Man is way to complex a shape for ah hour I think (I cropped off the rest of the arms because they were just shapeless red blobs). I'm still not happy, but it did come out better than the version with my boy...
And to be fair to him all the stuff is the right colour and in the right place, he just hasn't got the shapes down yet (the yellow stuff to the left is mine). The original photo has an orangy/yellow robot visible behind Iron-Man's head for example. I think he did rather well all things considered.
Time Taken - 35 Minutes
I wanted to drag the time of my paints back down kicking and screaming, and this was the result. It's based on yet more stock, this time from Marcus Ranum, who also does some top quality photography. Aspects of this are a bit rough (partly due to the speed I was going, something I'm out of practice with again) but overall I think I got the essence of the original photograph, and his neck area turned out pretty well IMO.
By the way, the title of the post is a quote from Spaceballs, if you were curious.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
The Best and Worst Sketching of January
I shouldn't be posting today really, I'm off work sick, so by rights I should be lying on the couch with a book and groaning a lot. Unfortunately my Son has a friend over to play and he's terrified of me. I mean really scared, like run screaming from the room whenever I show my face scared.
This is odd as I've never been anything but nice to him, so I'm forced to conclude that his parents have told him that the bogeyman is a 6'4" Welshman with a deep voice and a gut and he's made the connection.
So I'm banished to the office until he goes home.
But enough about me, and more about the sketches...
Figure and Perspective Practice
I've had some issues with my perspective stuff recently. It started out well, as you've probably seen in the last couple of months, but during January my brain decided that it wasn't going to play ball any more, arguing "you couldn't possibly see their feet from that angle" even though you almost certainly could. Hands and feet are still a blind spot of course, but I'm improving slowly (very slowly). In fact I drew quite a few hands on their own in January, but they were neither good enough to post, nor really bad enough to go in the bad. I'll try and do a really good one by next month, or maybe a really bad one...
Free Sketching
Nothing from Reference in January (weeeell sort of, but we'll get to that), so straight to the free sketching. As usual this is predominantly portraiture stuff. That girl to the left and the lass in the lower right almost went into the bad image, but I decided I actually quite liked them at the last second. Things I'm most pleased with here include the chap who looks a lot like Patrick Stewart (in the middle), the chap who looks like Sam from Lord of the Rings (but not like the movie version), the bearded businessman and the girl at the bottom who looks like she's dancing. That upper arm on the Orc isn't too disgraceful either.
Focus Sketching
And here's a new thing. Focus sketching is where I have something in my head, and I try to hone in on what my brain wants me to draw. If you're really astute you can probably even work out what I was going for here, but I'm not going to spell it out in case it actually leads to a finished image one day. I said in the last section that I used no reference this month, but that's not quite true as I used some for the jacket and jeans for the girl on the right - it's not a straight copy though, I was just referencing how the folds might go.
Bad Stuff
Again, these aren't actually the worst sketches of the month, just the most disappointing given the time spent on each and the conditions they were sketched in. Well, I have included the single worse thing I drew in January though (it's the blob in the bottom right with a frowning face by it). The girl on the right was clearly drawn as part of the focus sketching shown above, but is miles away the worst of them; I didn't include all of the relevant sketches you understand, just the best, and this one. The rest aren't horrific I guess, but nowhere near as good as they should have been (and the girl at the bottom has really creepy eyes).
That's it for today. It won't be as long between this post and the next as I have some stuff all lined up and ready to go. I don't have anything after that though, so I should get cracking or next month will be really sparse :)
Oh, and my last post was the first post to ever receive a comment from an identifiable person who I've never had a drink with. This is amazing, it's like I'm writing a real blog (as my Grandfather would likely say). Feel free to follow the trend!
This is odd as I've never been anything but nice to him, so I'm forced to conclude that his parents have told him that the bogeyman is a 6'4" Welshman with a deep voice and a gut and he's made the connection.
So I'm banished to the office until he goes home.
But enough about me, and more about the sketches...
Figure and Perspective Practice
I've had some issues with my perspective stuff recently. It started out well, as you've probably seen in the last couple of months, but during January my brain decided that it wasn't going to play ball any more, arguing "you couldn't possibly see their feet from that angle" even though you almost certainly could. Hands and feet are still a blind spot of course, but I'm improving slowly (very slowly). In fact I drew quite a few hands on their own in January, but they were neither good enough to post, nor really bad enough to go in the bad. I'll try and do a really good one by next month, or maybe a really bad one...
Free Sketching
Nothing from Reference in January (weeeell sort of, but we'll get to that), so straight to the free sketching. As usual this is predominantly portraiture stuff. That girl to the left and the lass in the lower right almost went into the bad image, but I decided I actually quite liked them at the last second. Things I'm most pleased with here include the chap who looks a lot like Patrick Stewart (in the middle), the chap who looks like Sam from Lord of the Rings (but not like the movie version), the bearded businessman and the girl at the bottom who looks like she's dancing. That upper arm on the Orc isn't too disgraceful either.
Focus Sketching
And here's a new thing. Focus sketching is where I have something in my head, and I try to hone in on what my brain wants me to draw. If you're really astute you can probably even work out what I was going for here, but I'm not going to spell it out in case it actually leads to a finished image one day. I said in the last section that I used no reference this month, but that's not quite true as I used some for the jacket and jeans for the girl on the right - it's not a straight copy though, I was just referencing how the folds might go.
Bad Stuff
Again, these aren't actually the worst sketches of the month, just the most disappointing given the time spent on each and the conditions they were sketched in. Well, I have included the single worse thing I drew in January though (it's the blob in the bottom right with a frowning face by it). The girl on the right was clearly drawn as part of the focus sketching shown above, but is miles away the worst of them; I didn't include all of the relevant sketches you understand, just the best, and this one. The rest aren't horrific I guess, but nowhere near as good as they should have been (and the girl at the bottom has really creepy eyes).
That's it for today. It won't be as long between this post and the next as I have some stuff all lined up and ready to go. I don't have anything after that though, so I should get cracking or next month will be really sparse :)
Oh, and my last post was the first post to ever receive a comment from an identifiable person who I've never had a drink with. This is amazing, it's like I'm writing a real blog (as my Grandfather would likely say). Feel free to follow the trend!
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Multiple Choice Questions in Electronics Engineering Part 1
ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM FUNDAMENTALS
1. Who discovered the relationship between magnetism and electricity that serves as the foundation for the theory of electromagnetism?
A. Luigi Galvani
B. Hans Christian Oersted
C. Andre Ampere
D. Charles Coulomb
2. Who demonstrated the theory of electromagnetic induction in 1831?
A. Michael Faraday
B. Andre Ampere
C. James Clerk Maxwell
D. Charles Coulomb
3. Who developed the electromagnetic theory of light in 1862?
A. Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
B. Wilhelm Rontgen
C. James Clerk Maxwell
D. Andre Ampere
4. Who discovered that a current-carrying conductor would move when placed in a magnetic field?
A. Michael Faraday
B. Andre Ampere
C. Hans Christian Oersted
D. Gustav Robert Kirchhoff
5. Who discovered the most important electrical effects which is the magnetic effect?
A. Hans Christian Oersted
B. Sir Charles Wheatstone
C. Georg Ohm
D. James Clerk Maxwell
6. Who demonstrated that there are magnetic effects around every current-carrying conductor and that current-carrying conductors can attract and repel each other just like magnets?
A. Luigi Galvani
B. Hans Christian Oersted
C. Charles Coulomb
D. Andre Ampere
7. Who discovered superconductivity in 1911?
A. Kamerlingh Onnes
B. Alex Muller
C. Geory Bednorz
D. Charles Coulomb
8. The magnitude of the induced emf in a coil is directly proportional to the rate of change of flux linkages. This is known as
A. Joule’s Law
B. Faraday’s second law of electromagnetic induction
C. Faraday’s first law of electromagnetic induction
D. Coulomb’s Law
9. Whenever a flux inking a coil or current changes, an emf is induced in it. This is known as
A. Joule’s Law
B. Coulomb’s Law
C. Faraday’s first law of electromagnetic induction
D. Faraday’s second law of electromagnetic induction
10. The force of attraction or repulsion between two magnetic poles is directly proportional to their strengths.
A. Newton’s first law
B. Faraday’s first law of electromagnetic induction
C. Coulomb’s first law
D. Coulomb’s second law
11. The force of attraction or repulsion between two magnetic poles is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This is known as
A. Newton’s first law
B. Faraday’s first law of electromagnetic induction
C. Coulomb’s first law
D. Coulomb’s second law
12. Whenever a conductor cuts magnetic flux, an emf is induced in it. This is known as
A. Coulomb’s law
B. Joule’s law
C. Faraday’s law
D. Ohm’s law
13. A law that states that the polarity of the induced voltage will oppose the change in magnetic flux causing the induction.
A. Joule’s law
B. Faraday’s law
C. Coulomb’s law
D. Lenz’ law
14. A law that states that the current in a thermionic diode varies directly with the three-halves power of anode voltage and inversely with the square of the distance between the electrodes, provided operating conditions are such that the current is limited only by the space charge.
A. Hall’s law
B. Joule’s law
C. Child’s law
D. Coulomb’s law
15. States that the ratio of the thermal conductivity is proportional to the absolute temperature for all metals.
A. Wien’s displacement law
B. Hartleys law
C. Hall’s law
D. Wiedemann Franz law
16. A law establishing the fact that the algebraic su of the rises and drops of the mmf around a closed loop of a magnetic circuit is equal to zero.
A. Kirchhoff’s circuital law
B. Maxwell’s circuital law
C. Ampere’s circuital law
D. Coulomb’s circuital law
17. The net electrical charge in an isolated system remains constant. This is known as
A. Law of conservation of charge
B. Coulomb’s first law
C. Coulomb’s second law
D. Law of conservation of energy
18. Lenz’s law is the consequence of the law of conservation of
A. Energy
B. Charge
C. Field lines
D. Momentum
19. Lenz’ law states that the direction of the induced emf and hence current
A. Is determined by the rate of current flux
B. Is found by the right hand rule
C. Is found by the left hand rule
D. Always opposes the cause producing it
20. If you hold the conductor with right hand so that the stretched thumb points in the direction of the current, then encircling fingers will give the direction of magnetic lines of force round the conductor. This is known as
A. Left hand cork screw rule
B. Right hand cork screw rule
C. Left hand rule
D. Right hand rule
21. If the right handed bottle-opener cork screw is assumed to be along the conductor so as to advance in the direction of current flow, the motion of its handle will indicate the direction of magnetic flux produced around the conductor. This is known as
A. Right hand rule
B. Left hand rule
C. Cork screw rule
D. End rule
22. If on looking at any one end of a solenoid; the direction of current flow is found to be clockwise then the end under observation is a south pole. This is known as
A. Right hand rule
B. Left hand rule
C. Cork screw rule
D. End Rule
23. If the solenoid is gripped by the right hand with the fingers pointing the direction of current flow, the outstretched thumb will then point the north pole. This is known as
A. Right hand rule
B. Helix rule
C. End rule
D. Cork screw rule
24. The process by which an emf and hence current is generated or induced in a conductor when there is a change in the magnetic flux linking the conductor is called
A. Electromagnetic induction
B. Mutual induction
C. Faraday’s law
D. Electromagnetic interference
25. The emf induced in a coil due to the change of its own flux linked with it is called
A. Mutually induced emf
B. Dynamically induced emf
C. Statically induced emf
D. Self induced emf
26. The emf induced in a coil due to the changing current of another neighboring coil is called
A. Mutually induced emf
B. Self induced emf
C. Statically induced emf
D. Dynamically induced emf
27. When a conductor is stationary and the magnetic field is moving or changing the emf induced is called
A. Statically induced emf
B. Mutually induced emf
C. Self induced emf
D. Dynamically induced emf
28. The magnetic potential in a magnetic circuit can be measured in terms of
A. Mmf
B. Emf
C. Farad
D. Coulomb
29. A substance that attracts pieces iron
A. Conductor
B. Semiconductor
C. Magnet
D. All of the above
30. The phenomenon by which a subtracts pieces of iron
A. Magnetism
B. Electromagnetism
C. Naturalism
D. Materialism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
SYNCHRONOUS DATA TRANSMISSION Uses the principle of handshaking BIT RATE OF V.22 1200 kbps BIT RATE OF V.90 56 kbps BIT RATE OF V.34 33.6 kb...
-
Well, this is a little awkward. Usually I write these posts and time them to coincide with the launch of the book they're about. In th...
-
I have produced next to nothing this month. This is due to a combination of factors, among them is the aspect of pure laziness, the videoga...
-
ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM FUNDAMENTALS 1. Who discovered the relationship between magnetism and electricity that serves as the fo...
-
Chapter 7 Communication Technique 1 Why are image frequencies somewhat less of a problem in FM receivers than they are in SS...
-
1. What are the elements falls under Group IA in the periodic table? ANSWER: Alkali Metals 2. What are the elements falls under Gr...
-
QUESTIONS: What refers to a series of tones that sounds good when used in combination An MPD shop properly identifies its ...
-
Link: http://xz9st7.megadl.fr/en/ Use Google Chrome if you want to translate the page from french to english
-
Self-Test & Supply the missing word(s) in each statement. Choose the letter that best answers each question. 1. The ...
-
Self-Test & Supply the missing word(s) in each statement. Choose the letter that best answers each question. 1. Imag...